FEIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohu has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of -22.69%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat Cohu's return on equity of -7.75%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohu has an analysts' consensus of $29.50 which suggests that it could grow by 109.82%. Given that Cohu has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Cohu is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.433, which suggesting that the stock is 56.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohu has a beta of 1.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.76%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Cohu quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is higher than Cohu's net income of -$21.4M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.17x while Cohu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.53x versus 1.64x for Cohu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 8.38%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 3.19%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.433, which suggesting that the stock is 56.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.294, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.607%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of $201K. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.17x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 31.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.53x versus 1.52x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 9.48%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat Itron's return on equity of 17.69%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.3%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.433, which suggesting that the stock is 56.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.69%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $612.9M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is lower than Itron's net income of $58.1M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.17x while Itron's PE ratio is 19.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.53x versus 1.95x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS Instruments has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 9.74%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat MKS Instruments's return on equity of 8.06%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MKS Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $121.96 which suggests that it could grow by 91.4%. Given that MKS Instruments has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe MKS Instruments is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.433, which suggesting that the stock is 56.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.809, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.873%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS Instruments offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS Instruments pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS Instruments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than MKS Instruments quarterly revenues of $934M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is lower than MKS Instruments's net income of $91M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.17x while MKS Instruments's PE ratio is 22.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.53x versus 1.20x for MKS Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.