Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Buy
55
ERNZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.32
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$24.46 - $24.50
52-week range:
$23.71 - $25.78
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.3K
Avg. volume:
18.9K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCF
High Income Securities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCD
Lmp Capital & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
|
$24.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 0% | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
$18.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0% | -- |
|
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
|
$13.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 9.9% | -- |
|
PCF
High Income Securities Fund
|
$6.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 11.07% | -- |
|
SCD
Lmp Capital & Income Fund
|
$17.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.81% | -- |
|
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
|
$26.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 2.43% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
-- | 0.873 | -- | -- |
|
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
|
-- | 0.623 | -- | -- |
|
PCF
High Income Securities Fund
|
-- | 1.175 | -- | -- |
|
SCD
Lmp Capital & Income Fund
|
-- | 1.167 | -- | -- |
|
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ERNZ
TrueShares Active Yield ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCF
High Income Securities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCD
Lmp Capital & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
TrueShares Active Yield ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ERNZ or CSQ?
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net margin of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- CSQCalamos Strategic Total Return Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ERNZ or CSQ?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TrueShares Active Yield ETF has higher upside potential than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund, analysts believe TrueShares Active Yield ETF is more attractive than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF0 0 0 CSQCalamos Strategic Total Return Fund0 0 0 -
Is ERNZ or CSQ More Risky?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.507%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERNZ or CSQ?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. TrueShares Active Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ERNZ or CSQ?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund quarterly revenues of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net income of --. Notably, TrueShares Active Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TrueShares Active Yield ETF is -- versus -- for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- -- CSQCalamos Strategic Total Return Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ERNZ or HIPS?
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net margin of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- HIPSGraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ERNZ or HIPS?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TrueShares Active Yield ETF has higher upside potential than GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF, analysts believe TrueShares Active Yield ETF is more attractive than GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF0 0 0 HIPSGraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ERNZ or HIPS More Risky?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.501%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERNZ or HIPS?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF offers a yield of 9.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. TrueShares Active Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ERNZ or HIPS?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, TrueShares Active Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TrueShares Active Yield ETF is -- versus -- for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- -- HIPSGraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ERNZ or PCF?
High Income Securities Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net margin of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat High Income Securities Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- PCFHigh Income Securities Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ERNZ or PCF?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand High Income Securities Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TrueShares Active Yield ETF has higher upside potential than High Income Securities Fund, analysts believe TrueShares Active Yield ETF is more attractive than High Income Securities Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF0 0 0 PCFHigh Income Securities Fund0 0 0 -
Is ERNZ or PCF More Risky?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Income Securities Fund has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.927%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERNZ or PCF?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Income Securities Fund offers a yield of 11.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. TrueShares Active Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Income Securities Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ERNZ or PCF?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than High Income Securities Fund quarterly revenues of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than High Income Securities Fund's net income of --. Notably, TrueShares Active Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Income Securities Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TrueShares Active Yield ETF is -- versus -- for High Income Securities Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- -- PCFHigh Income Securities Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ERNZ or SCD?
Lmp Capital & Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net margin of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat Lmp Capital & Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- SCDLmp Capital & Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ERNZ or SCD?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lmp Capital & Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TrueShares Active Yield ETF has higher upside potential than Lmp Capital & Income Fund, analysts believe TrueShares Active Yield ETF is more attractive than Lmp Capital & Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF0 0 0 SCDLmp Capital & Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is ERNZ or SCD More Risky?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lmp Capital & Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.196%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERNZ or SCD?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lmp Capital & Income Fund offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. TrueShares Active Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lmp Capital & Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ERNZ or SCD?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lmp Capital & Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than Lmp Capital & Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, TrueShares Active Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lmp Capital & Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TrueShares Active Yield ETF is -- versus -- for Lmp Capital & Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- -- SCDLmp Capital & Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ERNZ or TBFG?
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net margin of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's return on equity of -- beat The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- TBFGThe Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ERNZ or TBFG?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TrueShares Active Yield ETF has higher upside potential than The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF, analysts believe TrueShares Active Yield ETF is more attractive than The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF0 0 0 TBFGThe Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is ERNZ or TBFG More Risky?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ERNZ or TBFG?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. TrueShares Active Yield ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ERNZ or TBFG?
TrueShares Active Yield ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net income of -- is lower than The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, TrueShares Active Yield ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TrueShares Active Yield ETF is -- versus -- for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ERNZTrueShares Active Yield ETF-- -- -- -- TBFGThe Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
