ERII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conair has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of --. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Conair's return on equity of --.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 50.98%. On the other hand Conair has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Conair, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Conair.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conair has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.94%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are larger than Conair quarterly revenues of --. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is higher than Conair's net income of --. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Conair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 4.63x versus -- for Conair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 11.02%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 50.98%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.78%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Donaldson.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66900000000001%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 4.63x versus 2.27x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 14.08%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.71%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 50.98%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $28.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.97%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.304%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $364.3M. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $51.3M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 26.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 4.63x versus 2.81x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of -122.51% compared to Energy Recovery's net margin of 4.52%. Energy Recovery's return on equity of 9.95% beat Tennant's return on equity of 10.9%.

Energy Recovery has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 50.98%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $119.33 which suggests that it could grow by 65.03%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Energy Recovery.

Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.838%.

Energy Recovery has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Energy Recovery pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than Tennant quarterly revenues of $290M. Energy Recovery's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Tennant's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Energy Recovery's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Tennant's PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery is 4.63x versus 1.09x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.