EFOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -26.42% compared to Energy Focus's net margin of -5.96%. Energy Focus's return on equity of -63.24% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -9.56%.

Energy Focus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3181.25%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.1%. Given that Energy Focus has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Energy Focus is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Energy Focus has a beta of 1.825, which suggesting that the stock is 82.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.196%.

Energy Focus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Energy Focus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Energy Focus's net income of -$316K is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Energy Focus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus is 1.01x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -26.42% compared to Energy Focus's net margin of --. Energy Focus's return on equity of -63.24% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Energy Focus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3181.25%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -25.09%. Given that Energy Focus has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Energy Focus is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Energy Focus has a beta of 1.825, which suggesting that the stock is 82.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.

Energy Focus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Focus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Energy Focus's net income of -$316K is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Energy Focus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus is 1.01x versus 267.77x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -26.42% compared to Energy Focus's net margin of --. Energy Focus's return on equity of -63.24% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Energy Focus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3181.25%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Focus has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Energy Focus is more attractive than Northann.

Energy Focus has a beta of 1.825, which suggesting that the stock is 82.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Focus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Focus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Energy Focus's net income of -$316K is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Energy Focus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus is 1.01x versus 0.53x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Energy Systems has a net margin of -26.42% compared to Energy Focus's net margin of -18.72%. Energy Focus's return on equity of -63.24% beat Orion Energy Systems's return on equity of -39.86%.

Energy Focus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3181.25%. On the other hand Orion Energy Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 197.97%. Given that Energy Focus has higher upside potential than Orion Energy Systems, analysts believe Energy Focus is more attractive than Orion Energy Systems.

Energy Focus has a beta of 1.825, which suggesting that the stock is 82.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Energy Systems has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.931%.

Energy Focus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Energy Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Focus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Energy Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Focus quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Orion Energy Systems quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Energy Focus's net income of -$316K is higher than Orion Energy Systems's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Energy Focus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Orion Energy Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Focus is 1.01x versus 0.30x for Orion Energy Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.