DSGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlueLinx Holdings has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Distribution Solutions Group's net margin of 2.14%. Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34% beat BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 4.61%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand BlueLinx Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.18%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than Distribution Solutions Group, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than Distribution Solutions Group.

Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.371%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlueLinx Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Distribution Solutions Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlueLinx Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues are $468M, which are smaller than BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues of $747.3M. Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $16M. Notably, Distribution Solutions Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,788.50x while BlueLinx Holdings's PE ratio is 29.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Distribution Solutions Group is 0.98x versus 0.31x for BlueLinx Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Distribution Solutions Group's net margin of 4.46%. Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.08%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -6.12%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.494%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Distribution Solutions Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues are $468M, which are smaller than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $472.9M. Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Distribution Solutions Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,788.50x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Distribution Solutions Group is 0.98x versus 0.77x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Distribution Solutions Group's net margin of 7.32%. Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 20.14%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.07%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.75%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Distribution Solutions Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues are $468M, which are smaller than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $979.4M. Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M is lower than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $71.7M. Notably, Distribution Solutions Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,788.50x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 16.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Distribution Solutions Group is 0.98x versus 1.12x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies has a net margin of 4.68% compared to Distribution Solutions Group's net margin of 1.09%. Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34% beat Resideo Technologies's return on equity of 5.91%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.08%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than Resideo Technologies, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than Resideo Technologies.

Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies has a beta of 2.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.722%.

Distribution Solutions Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resideo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Distribution Solutions Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues are $468M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than Resideo Technologies's net income of $20M. Notably, Distribution Solutions Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,788.50x while Resideo Technologies's PE ratio is 21.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Distribution Solutions Group is 0.98x versus 0.56x for Resideo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.