DOCU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asana has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Docusign's net margin of -33.08%. Docusign's return on equity of 64.96% beat Asana's return on equity of -90.94%.

Docusign has a consensus price target of $92.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.27%. On the other hand Asana has an analysts' consensus of $15.44 which suggests that it could grow by 6.66%. Given that Docusign has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Docusign is more attractive than Asana.

Docusign has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asana has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Docusign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Asana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Docusign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Asana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Docusign quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are larger than Asana quarterly revenues of $188.3M. Docusign's net income of $83.5M is higher than Asana's net income of -$62.3M. Notably, Docusign's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while Asana's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docusign is 5.23x versus 4.59x for Asana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Docusign's net margin of -555.78%. Docusign's return on equity of 64.96% beat Strategy's return on equity of -19.84%.

Docusign has a consensus price target of $92.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.27%. On the other hand Strategy has an analysts' consensus of $488.01 which suggests that it could grow by 42.26%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Docusign, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Docusign.

Docusign has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy has a beta of 3.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 246.014%.

Docusign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Docusign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Docusign quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are larger than Strategy quarterly revenues of $120.7M. Docusign's net income of $83.5M is higher than Strategy's net income of -$670.8M. Notably, Docusign's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while Strategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docusign is 5.23x versus 142.47x for Strategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Docusign's net margin of 20.78%. Docusign's return on equity of 64.96% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Docusign has a consensus price target of $92.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.27%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $180.47 which suggests that it could grow by 41.84%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Docusign, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Docusign.

Docusign has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.513%.

Docusign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Docusign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Docusign quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Docusign's net income of $83.5M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Docusign's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while Oracle's PE ratio is 29.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docusign is 5.23x versus 6.52x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SS&C Technologies Holdings has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Docusign's net margin of 16.23%. Docusign's return on equity of 64.96% beat SS&C Technologies Holdings's return on equity of 11.57%.

Docusign has a consensus price target of $92.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.27%. On the other hand SS&C Technologies Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $95.72 which suggests that it could grow by 30.14%. Given that SS&C Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Docusign, analysts believe SS&C Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Docusign.

Docusign has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SS&C Technologies Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.488%.

Docusign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SS&C Technologies Holdings offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Docusign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SS&C Technologies Holdings pays out 32.2% of its earnings as a dividend. SS&C Technologies Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Docusign quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are smaller than SS&C Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Docusign's net income of $83.5M is lower than SS&C Technologies Holdings's net income of $248.2M. Notably, Docusign's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.52x while SS&C Technologies Holdings's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Docusign is 5.23x versus 3.17x for SS&C Technologies Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.