CYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -11405.93% compared to Cyngn's net margin of -11.03%. Cyngn's return on equity of -249.93% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Cyngn has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1913.09%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 98.28%. Given that Cyngn has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Cyngn is more attractive than Castellum.

Cyngn has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.

Cyngn has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cyngn pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cyngn quarterly revenues are $47.6K, which are smaller than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Cyngn's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Cyngn's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cyngn is 7.03x versus 0.69x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -11405.93% compared to Cyngn's net margin of 4.19%. Cyngn's return on equity of -249.93% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

Cyngn has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1913.09%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cyngn has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe Cyngn is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

Cyngn has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cyngn has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cyngn pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cyngn quarterly revenues are $47.6K, which are smaller than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Cyngn's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, Cyngn's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cyngn is 7.03x versus 14.95x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lyft has a net margin of -11405.93% compared to Cyngn's net margin of -0.82%. Cyngn's return on equity of -249.93% beat Lyft's return on equity of -11.93%.

Cyngn has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1913.09%. On the other hand Lyft has an analysts' consensus of $19.46 which suggests that it could grow by 39.9%. Given that Cyngn has higher upside potential than Lyft, analysts believe Cyngn is more attractive than Lyft.

Cyngn has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lyft has a beta of 2.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.624%.

Cyngn has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lyft offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cyngn pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lyft pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cyngn quarterly revenues are $47.6K, which are smaller than Lyft quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Cyngn's net income of -$5.4M is higher than Lyft's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Cyngn's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lyft's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cyngn is 7.03x versus 1.03x for Lyft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of -11405.93% compared to Cyngn's net margin of --. Cyngn's return on equity of -249.93% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Cyngn has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1913.09%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.71%. Given that Cyngn has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Cyngn is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Cyngn has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cyngn has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cyngn pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cyngn quarterly revenues are $47.6K, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Cyngn's net income of -$5.4M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Cyngn's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cyngn is 7.03x versus 9.99x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.