CPSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 11.19%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.69%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.592%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $19.1M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 17.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.87x versus 2.20x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -6.72%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -21.64%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CPS Technologies has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe CPS Technologies is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.6M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is higher than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$240K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.87x versus 0.32x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -13.17%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1159.45%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.431%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $4M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is higher than Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.87x versus 0.75x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -105.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -497.03%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2226.3%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 218.852%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.6M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.87x versus 0.16x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.