Financhill
Buy
56

CPSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.69
Seasonality move :
6.29%
Day range:
$1.63 - $1.74
52-week range:
$1.27 - $2.46
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
35.93x
P/S ratio:
1.11x
P/B ratio:
1.71x
Volume:
19.7K
Avg. volume:
23.7K
1-year change:
-0.57%
Market cap:
$25.1M
Revenue:
$21.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.20

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CPSH
CPS Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
AXIL
AXIL Brands
-- -- -- -- --
BKTI
BK Technologies
$17M $0.44 -6.75% 131.58% $51.00
MITQ
Moving iMage Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
MSN
Emerson Radio
-- -- -- -- --
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CPSH
CPS Technologies
$1.73 -- $25.1M 35.93x $0.00 0% 1.11x
AXIL
AXIL Brands
$6.69 -- $44.5M 29.09x $0.00 0% 1.76x
BKTI
BK Technologies
$43.99 $51.00 $157.2M 19.82x $0.00 0% 2.13x
MITQ
Moving iMage Technologies
$0.56 -- $5.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.30x
MSN
Emerson Radio
$0.40 -- $8.4M 22.88x $0.00 0% 0.76x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$0.88 -- $11.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.17x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CPSH
CPS Technologies
-- -0.483 -- 2.13x
AXIL
AXIL Brands
1.44% 0.975 0.26% 2.26x
BKTI
BK Technologies
-- -0.850 -- 1.03x
MITQ
Moving iMage Technologies
-- 0.682 -- 1.60x
MSN
Emerson Radio
-- -0.192 -- 9.37x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
50.16% 11.669 426.14% 0.18x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CPSH
CPS Technologies
$1.2M $129.7K -18.43% -18.46% 1.73% -$1.5M
AXIL
AXIL Brands
$5M $583.1K 13.2% 13.42% 9.12% -$318.1K
BKTI
BK Technologies
$7.4M $2.2M 29.93% 34.24% 12.1% $2.9M
MITQ
Moving iMage Technologies
$936K -$561K -26.11% -26.11% -16.3% $70K
MSN
Emerson Radio
$491K -$733K -12.82% -12.82% -18.31% -$295K
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$1.6M -$1.9M -193.52% -275.7% -57.72% -$1.1M

CPS Technologies vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CPSH or AXIL?

    AXIL Brands has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 8.33%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat AXIL Brands's return on equity of 13.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    16.4% $0.01 $14.7M
    AXIL
    AXIL Brands
    71.75% $0.07 $9.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About CPSH or AXIL?

    CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXIL Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CPS Technologies has higher upside potential than AXIL Brands, analysts believe CPS Technologies is more attractive than AXIL Brands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    0 0 0
    AXIL
    AXIL Brands
    0 0 0
  • Is CPSH or AXIL More Risky?

    CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXIL Brands has a beta of -0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.114%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPSH or AXIL?

    CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXIL Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXIL Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CPSH or AXIL?

    CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than AXIL Brands quarterly revenues of $6.9M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is lower than AXIL Brands's net income of $576.7K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while AXIL Brands's PE ratio is 29.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.11x versus 1.76x for AXIL Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    1.11x 35.93x $7.5M $96K
    AXIL
    AXIL Brands
    1.76x 29.09x $6.9M $576.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns CPSH or BKTI?

    BK Technologies has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 20.4%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 34.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    16.4% $0.01 $14.7M
    BKTI
    BK Technologies
    41.16% $0.93 $29.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About CPSH or BKTI?

    CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    0 0 0
    BKTI
    BK Technologies
    1 0 0
  • Is CPSH or BKTI More Risky?

    CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.592%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPSH or BKTI?

    CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CPSH or BKTI?

    CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $17.9M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $3.7M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.11x versus 2.13x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    1.11x 35.93x $7.5M $96K
    BKTI
    BK Technologies
    2.13x 19.82x $17.9M $3.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CPSH or MITQ?

    Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -15.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -26.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    16.4% $0.01 $14.7M
    MITQ
    Moving iMage Technologies
    27.2% -$0.05 $5.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CPSH or MITQ?

    CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CPS Technologies has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe CPS Technologies is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    0 0 0
    MITQ
    Moving iMage Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is CPSH or MITQ More Risky?

    CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPSH or MITQ?

    CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CPSH or MITQ?

    CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.4M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is higher than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$527K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.11x versus 0.30x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    1.11x 35.93x $7.5M $96K
    MITQ
    Moving iMage Technologies
    0.30x -- $3.4M -$527K
  • Which has Higher Returns CPSH or MSN?

    Emerson Radio has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -13.17%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    16.4% $0.01 $14.7M
    MSN
    Emerson Radio
    12.27% -$0.03 $23.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About CPSH or MSN?

    CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1149.69%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    0 0 0
    MSN
    Emerson Radio
    0 0 0
  • Is CPSH or MSN More Risky?

    CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.431%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPSH or MSN?

    CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CPSH or MSN?

    CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $4M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is higher than Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.11x versus 0.76x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    1.11x 35.93x $7.5M $96K
    MSN
    Emerson Radio
    0.76x 22.88x $4M -$527K
  • Which has Higher Returns CPSH or UAVS?

    AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 1.28% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -105.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -18.46% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    16.4% $0.01 $14.7M
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    49.75% -$16.03 $12.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CPSH or UAVS?

    CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2033.11%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    0 0 0
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is CPSH or UAVS More Risky?

    CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.235, which suggesting that the stock is 23.467% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 218.852%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPSH or UAVS?

    CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CPSH or UAVS?

    CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. CPS Technologies's net income of $96K is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.11x versus 0.17x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CPSH
    CPS Technologies
    1.11x 35.93x $7.5M $96K
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0.17x -- $3.3M -$3.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?

Broadcom (Nasdaq: AVGO) stock has gone up more than 64%…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
60
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 7

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 22.52% over the past day.

Buy
77
FARO alert for May 7

Faro Technologies [FARO] is down 0% over the past day.

Buy
53
SRPT alert for May 7

Sarepta Therapeutics [SRPT] is down 21.54% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock