COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 14.22%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 5.59%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.3%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.415%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.84x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 29.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.03x versus 2.89x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 23.89%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 5.59%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $61.4526 which suggests that it could fall by -3.08%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.095%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.84x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 39.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.03x versus 8.47x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 10.24%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 5.59%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.15 which suggests that it could grow by 16.86%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.84x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.03x versus 1.95x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Shot has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -12652.75%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Safety Shot's return on equity of -1243.79%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 5.59%. On the other hand Safety Shot has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 706.06%. Given that Safety Shot has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Safety Shot is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Shot has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Shot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Shot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are larger than Safety Shot quarterly revenues of $42.1K. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is higher than Safety Shot's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.84x while Safety Shot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.03x versus 23.47x for Safety Shot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.