COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 14.22%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.415%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.95x versus 2.99x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 29.92%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.95x versus 6.67x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 14.94%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $59.0178 which suggests that it could fall by -2.55%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.095%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 38.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.95x versus 8.19x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 10.24%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.22, signalling upside risk potential of 7.67%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.89%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.95x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.