CLBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of 16.18% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of 6.43%. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -104.32% beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 12.64%.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $24.57, signalling upside risk potential of 47.05%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that Cellebrite DI has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises, analysts believe Cellebrite DI is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises.

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.347%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 27.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $147.3M. Cellebrite DI's net income of $17.4M is higher than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 19.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 8.87x versus 1.30x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MIND C.T.I. has a net margin of 16.18% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of 9.81%. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -104.32% beat MIND C.T.I.'s return on equity of 17.04%.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $24.57, signalling upside risk potential of 47.05%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cellebrite DI has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I., analysts believe Cellebrite DI is more attractive than MIND C.T.I..

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.187%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. offers a yield of 15.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. pays out 105.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. quarterly revenues of $5M. Cellebrite DI's net income of $17.4M is higher than MIND C.T.I.'s net income of $490K. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I.'s PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 8.87x versus 1.45x for MIND C.T.I.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 16.18% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of -539.62%. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -104.32% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $24.57, signalling upside risk potential of 47.05%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -14.09%. Given that Cellebrite DI has higher upside potential than SatixFy Communications, analysts believe Cellebrite DI is more attractive than SatixFy Communications.

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Cellebrite DI's net income of $17.4M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 8.87x versus 11.81x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silynxcom has a net margin of 16.18% compared to Cellebrite DI's net margin of --. Cellebrite DI's return on equity of -104.32% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

Cellebrite DI has a consensus price target of $24.57, signalling upside risk potential of 47.05%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 339.95%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than Cellebrite DI, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than Cellebrite DI.

Cellebrite DI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cellebrite DI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cellebrite DI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cellebrite DI quarterly revenues are $107.5M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Cellebrite DI's net income of $17.4M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Cellebrite DI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cellebrite DI is 8.87x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.