CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Creative Realities has a net margin of -29.63% compared to Confluent's net margin of 0.37%. Confluent's return on equity of -41.28% beat Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $30.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand Creative Realities has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 169.78%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Confluent, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Confluent.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Realities has a beta of 3.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.506%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Creative Realities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Realities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are larger than Creative Realities quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Confluent's net income of -$74.1M is lower than Creative Realities's net income of $54K. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Creative Realities's PE ratio is 18.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 10.38x versus 0.54x for Creative Realities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digimarc has a net margin of -29.63% compared to Confluent's net margin of -113.88%. Confluent's return on equity of -41.28% beat Digimarc's return on equity of -56.45%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $30.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.27%. Given that Confluent has higher upside potential than Digimarc, analysts believe Confluent is more attractive than Digimarc.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.892%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Confluent's net income of -$74.1M is lower than Digimarc's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 10.38x versus 20.47x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HashiCorp has a net margin of -29.63% compared to Confluent's net margin of -7.5%. Confluent's return on equity of -41.28% beat HashiCorp's return on equity of -10.01%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $30.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand HashiCorp has an analysts' consensus of $34.86 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Confluent has higher upside potential than HashiCorp, analysts believe Confluent is more attractive than HashiCorp.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HashiCorp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HashiCorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HashiCorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are larger than HashiCorp quarterly revenues of $173.4M. Confluent's net income of -$74.1M is lower than HashiCorp's net income of -$13M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HashiCorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 10.38x versus 10.49x for HashiCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -29.63% compared to Confluent's net margin of 4.75%. Confluent's return on equity of -41.28% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.92%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $30.29, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.42%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Confluent, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Confluent.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.58%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.4M. Confluent's net income of -$74.1M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 260.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 10.38x versus 6.53x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.