CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asure Software has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of -10.41%. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat Asure Software's return on equity of -6%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.96, signalling upside risk potential of 48.98%. On the other hand Asure Software has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 45.96%. Given that Confluent has higher upside potential than Asure Software, analysts believe Confluent is more attractive than Asure Software.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asure Software has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.989%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Asure Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Asure Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Asure Software quarterly revenues of $30.8M. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is lower than Asure Software's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Asure Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 6.25x versus 2.14x for Asure Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cycurion has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of --. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat Cycurion's return on equity of --.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.96, signalling upside risk potential of 48.98%. On the other hand Cycurion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent has higher upside potential than Cycurion, analysts believe Confluent is more attractive than Cycurion.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Cycurion quarterly revenues of --. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is higher than Cycurion's net income of --. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion's PE ratio is 6.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 6.25x versus 0.26x for Cycurion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digimarc has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of -99.89%. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat Digimarc's return on equity of -54.93%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.96, signalling upside risk potential of 48.98%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of $27.50 which suggests that it could grow by 107.08%. Given that Digimarc has higher upside potential than Confluent, analysts believe Digimarc is more attractive than Confluent.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.162%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is lower than Digimarc's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 6.25x versus 7.35x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -24.92% compared to Confluent's net margin of 1.08%. Confluent's return on equity of -34.45% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.73%.

Confluent has a consensus price target of $28.96, signalling upside risk potential of 48.98%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $33.25 which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Confluent, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Confluent.

Confluent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.42%.

Confluent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $50.1M. Confluent's net income of -$67.6M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $539K. Notably, Confluent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 183.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent is 6.25x versus 3.97x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.