CDLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cardlytics's net margin of -16.97%. Cardlytics's return on equity of -138.45% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.

Cardlytics has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 57.61%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardlytics has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Cardlytics is more attractive than Lendway.

Cardlytics has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.225%.

Cardlytics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics quarterly revenues are $74M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Cardlytics's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Cardlytics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics is 0.32x versus 0.19x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cardlytics's net margin of 18.77%. Cardlytics's return on equity of -138.45% beat Magnite's return on equity of 3.16%.

Cardlytics has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 57.61%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $19.19 which suggests that it could grow by 58.48%. Given that Magnite has higher upside potential than Cardlytics, analysts believe Magnite is more attractive than Cardlytics.

Cardlytics has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.693, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.283%.

Cardlytics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics quarterly revenues are $74M, which are smaller than Magnite quarterly revenues of $194M. Cardlytics's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Magnite's net income of $36.4M. Notably, Cardlytics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magnite's PE ratio is 86.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics is 0.32x versus 2.69x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stagwell has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cardlytics's net margin of 0.41%. Cardlytics's return on equity of -138.45% beat Stagwell's return on equity of 0.29%.

Cardlytics has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 57.61%. On the other hand Stagwell has an analysts' consensus of $8.89 which suggests that it could grow by 58.16%. Given that Stagwell has higher upside potential than Cardlytics, analysts believe Stagwell is more attractive than Cardlytics.

Cardlytics has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stagwell has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.292%.

Cardlytics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stagwell offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stagwell pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics quarterly revenues are $74M, which are smaller than Stagwell quarterly revenues of $788.7M. Cardlytics's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Stagwell's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Cardlytics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stagwell's PE ratio is 281.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics is 0.32x versus 0.23x for Stagwell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cardlytics's net margin of 15.52%. Cardlytics's return on equity of -138.45% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 3.42%.

Cardlytics has a consensus price target of $2.90, signalling upside risk potential of 57.61%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $51.71 which suggests that it could grow by 64.38%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than Cardlytics, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than Cardlytics.

Cardlytics has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.466%.

Cardlytics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics quarterly revenues are $74M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $412.8M. Cardlytics's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Cardlytics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics is 0.32x versus 1.03x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.