Financhill
Buy
70

CCEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$18.90
Seasonality move :
2.4%
Day range:
$17.16 - $19.12
52-week range:
$14.09 - $20.40
Dividend yield:
3.18%
P/E ratio:
7.37x
P/S ratio:
2.56x
P/B ratio:
0.89x
Volume:
17.5K
Avg. volume:
14.1K
1-year change:
12.8%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$369.4M
EPS (TTM):
$2.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
$105.8M $0.36 10.15% -32.9% $22.67
ESEA
Euroseas
$53.9M $3.09 15.37% 7.55% $53.67
GLBS
Globus Maritime
$10.7M -- 38.73% -- $4.00
HMR
Heidmar Maritime Holdings
-- -- -- -- $7.00
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners LP
$254M $1.62 -20.27% -27.27% $65.50
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
$161.9M -$0.28 72.39% -38286.54% $21.81
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
$18.86 $22.67 $1.1B 7.37x $0.15 3.18% 2.56x
ESEA
Euroseas
$31.13 $53.67 $219.4M 1.93x $0.53 6.4% 1.02x
GLBS
Globus Maritime
$1.09 $4.00 $22.4M 54.48x $0.00 0% 0.64x
HMR
Heidmar Maritime Holdings
$2.67 $7.00 $75.8M 12.22x $0.00 0% 2.47x
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners LP
$34.31 $65.50 $1B 2.86x $0.05 0.58% 0.77x
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
$14.74 $21.81 $1.7B 5.56x $0.09 14.52% 1.26x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
100% 0.154 240.53% 1.42x
ESEA
Euroseas
36.14% -0.329 99.06% 1.38x
GLBS
Globus Maritime
32.57% 1.878 353.87% 1.39x
HMR
Heidmar Maritime Holdings
-- 0.000 -- --
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners LP
100% 1.466 59.31% 0.97x
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
33.61% 0.581 71.44% 1.31x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
$60.7M $56.4M 8.43% 15.62% 54.7% $63.2M
ESEA
Euroseas
$30.6M $26.6M 22.72% 35.8% 52.34% $14.5M
GLBS
Globus Maritime
-$2.3M -$890K 0.18% 0.24% -1.23% -$34.6M
HMR
Heidmar Maritime Holdings
-- -- -- -- -- --
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners LP
$141.1M $120M 41.18% 14.25% 38.25% -$190.5M
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
$74.1M $55.5M 8.88% 14.09% 20.68% $68.9M

Capital Clean Energy Carriers vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or ESEA?

    Euroseas has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 45.76%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 35.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    57.7% $1.74 $2.6B
    ESEA
    Euroseas
    57.41% $3.49 $568.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or ESEA?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $53.67 which suggests that it could grow by 72.4%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    3 2 0
    ESEA
    Euroseas
    2 0 0
  • Is CCEC or ESEA More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.024%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or ESEA?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Euroseas offers a yield of 6.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or ESEA?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $53.3M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Euroseas's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 1.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.56x versus 1.02x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2.56x 7.37x $105.1M $102.3M
    ESEA
    Euroseas
    1.02x 1.93x $53.3M $24.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or GLBS?

    Globus Maritime has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of -23%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Globus Maritime's return on equity of 0.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    57.7% $1.74 $2.6B
    GLBS
    Globus Maritime
    -26.53% -$0.10 $261.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or GLBS?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Globus Maritime has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 267.14%. Given that Globus Maritime has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Globus Maritime is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    3 2 0
    GLBS
    Globus Maritime
    0 0 0
  • Is CCEC or GLBS More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globus Maritime has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.881%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or GLBS?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Globus Maritime offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Globus Maritime pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or GLBS?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Globus Maritime quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Globus Maritime's net income of -$2M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Globus Maritime's PE ratio is 54.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.56x versus 0.64x for Globus Maritime. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2.56x 7.37x $105.1M $102.3M
    GLBS
    Globus Maritime
    0.64x 54.48x $8.7M -$2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or HMR?

    Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of --. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Heidmar Maritime Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    57.7% $1.74 $2.6B
    HMR
    Heidmar Maritime Holdings
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or HMR?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Heidmar Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 162.17%. Given that Heidmar Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Heidmar Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    3 2 0
    HMR
    Heidmar Maritime Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CCEC or HMR More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or HMR?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Heidmar Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidmar Maritime Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or HMR?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Heidmar Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Heidmar Maritime Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Heidmar Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.56x versus 2.47x for Heidmar Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2.56x 7.37x $105.1M $102.3M
    HMR
    Heidmar Maritime Holdings
    2.47x 12.22x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or NMM?

    Navios Maritime Partners LP has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 28.68%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Navios Maritime Partners LP's return on equity of 14.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    57.7% $1.74 $2.6B
    NMM
    Navios Maritime Partners LP
    41.41% $3.20 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or NMM?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Navios Maritime Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 90.91%. Given that Navios Maritime Partners LP has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Navios Maritime Partners LP is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    3 2 0
    NMM
    Navios Maritime Partners LP
    2 0 0
  • Is CCEC or NMM More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navios Maritime Partners LP has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.237%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or NMM?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Navios Maritime Partners LP offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners LP pays out 1.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or NMM?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are smaller than Navios Maritime Partners LP quarterly revenues of $340.8M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Navios Maritime Partners LP's net income of $97.8M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Navios Maritime Partners LP's PE ratio is 2.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.56x versus 0.77x for Navios Maritime Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2.56x 7.37x $105.1M $102.3M
    NMM
    Navios Maritime Partners LP
    0.77x 2.86x $340.8M $97.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or SBLK?

    Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 13.74%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    57.7% $1.74 $2.6B
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers
    23.99% $0.36 $3.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or SBLK?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $21.81 which suggests that it could grow by 47.97%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    3 2 0
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers
    3 2 0
  • Is CCEC or SBLK More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.393%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or SBLK?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 14.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or SBLK?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $308.9M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.37x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.56x versus 1.26x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2.56x 7.37x $105.1M $102.3M
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers
    1.26x 5.56x $308.9M $42.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Vertex Stock Still a Good Buy?
Is Vertex Stock Still a Good Buy?

Over the past ten years or so, Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:…

Is Okta Stock Finally Gaining Investor Confidence?
Is Okta Stock Finally Gaining Investor Confidence?

Given how digital transformation has proliferated, cyberattacks have also been…

Is The Trade Desk the Best Advertising Stock Now?
Is The Trade Desk the Best Advertising Stock Now?

The worldly backdrop is now shrouded in heavy uncertainty and…

Stock Ideas

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Sell
20
EVVTY alert for May 1

Evolution AB [EVVTY] is down 19.01% over the past day.

Sell
47
LANC alert for May 1

Lancaster Colony [LANC] is down 15.56% over the past day.

Sell
36
BHE alert for May 1

Benchmark Electronics [BHE] is down 15.02% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock