CCEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 45.76%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 35.8%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $53.67 which suggests that it could grow by 38.5%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.024%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Euroseas offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $53.3M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Euroseas's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.10x versus 1.27x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of --. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Heidmar Maritime Holdings's return on equity of --.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Heidmar Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 172.37%. Given that Heidmar Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Heidmar Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Heidmar Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidmar Maritime Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Heidmar Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Heidmar Maritime Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Heidmar Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.10x versus 2.47x for Heidmar Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navios Maritime Partners LP has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 28.68%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Navios Maritime Partners LP's return on equity of 14.25%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Navios Maritime Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.87%. Given that Navios Maritime Partners LP has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Navios Maritime Partners LP is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navios Maritime Partners LP has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.237%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Navios Maritime Partners LP offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners LP pays out 1.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are smaller than Navios Maritime Partners LP quarterly revenues of $340.8M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Navios Maritime Partners LP's net income of $97.8M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Navios Maritime Partners LP's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.10x versus 0.92x for Navios Maritime Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 13.74%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.09%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $23.40, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $19.70 which suggests that it could grow by 20.12%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, which suggesting that the stock is 69.931% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.393%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 13.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $308.9M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 6.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 3.10x versus 1.40x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.