CCBG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens Financial Services has a net margin of 22.83% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 30.05%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.3% beat Citizens Financial Services's return on equity of 9.71%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Citizens Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -6.27%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Citizens Financial Services, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Citizens Financial Services.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Financial Services has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.35%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Citizens Financial Services offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Financial Services pays out 47.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $57.5M, which are larger than Citizens Financial Services quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $13.1M is higher than Citizens Financial Services's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.09x while Citizens Financial Services's PE ratio is 11.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 2.78x versus 3.04x for Citizens Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 22.83% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 16.32%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.3% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $57.5M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $13.1M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.09x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 2.78x versus 2.88x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 22.83% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 27.77%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.3% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.97%. Given that Capital City Bank Group has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Capital City Bank Group is more attractive than Park National.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $57.5M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $13.1M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.09x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 2.78x versus 5.69x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 22.83% compared to Capital City Bank Group's net margin of 24.66%. Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.3% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Capital City Bank Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.11%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Capital City Bank Group, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Capital City Bank Group.

Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Capital City Bank Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Capital City Bank Group pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital City Bank Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues are $57.5M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Capital City Bank Group's net income of $13.1M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Capital City Bank Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.09x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital City Bank Group is 2.78x versus 3.35x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.