BRLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acme United has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of 4.62%. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat Acme United's return on equity of 19.79%.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.8%. Given that Acme United has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe Acme United is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.72%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 11.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than Acme United quarterly revenues of $48.2M. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Acme United's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acme United's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 0.79x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Better Choice has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of 13.42%. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 362.96%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.081%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 0.07x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DAVIDsTEA has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of --. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of --.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DAVIDsTEA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 858.72%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.741%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DAVIDsTEA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DAVIDsTEA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues of --. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is higher than DAVIDsTEA's net income of --. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DAVIDsTEA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 0.14x for DAVIDsTEA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of -1.41%. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88%.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.88%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.8M. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 1.85x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.