BLKB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 20.17%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.71%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $308.61 which suggests that it could grow by 8.34%. Given that Blackbaud has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Blackbaud is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.191%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 29.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.70x versus 6.22x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 18.49%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.71%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $321.15 which suggests that it could grow by 26.3%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 49.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.70x versus 9.00x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 0.54%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.71%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 270.27%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.70x versus 0.63x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith Micro Software has a net margin of -109.44% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of -88.35%. Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32% beat Smith Micro Software's return on equity of -100.51%.

Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.71%. On the other hand Smith Micro Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.83 which suggests that it could grow by 443.07%. Given that Smith Micro Software has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Smith Micro Software is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith Micro Software has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.792%.

Blackbaud has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith Micro Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackbaud pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith Micro Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackbaud quarterly revenues are $302.2M, which are larger than Smith Micro Software quarterly revenues of $5M. Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M is lower than Smith Micro Software's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Blackbaud's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.57x while Smith Micro Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackbaud is 2.70x versus 0.54x for Smith Micro Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.