ARHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brilliant Earth Group has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 0.3%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat Brilliant Earth Group's return on equity of 0.53%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $12.04, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Brilliant Earth Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.13 which suggests that it could grow by 44.56%. Given that Brilliant Earth Group has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe Brilliant Earth Group is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brilliant Earth Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brilliant Earth Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Brilliant Earth Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are larger than Brilliant Earth Group quarterly revenues of $119.5M. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is higher than Brilliant Earth Group's net income of $358K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while Brilliant Earth Group's PE ratio is 49.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.03x versus 0.27x for Brilliant Earth Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles & Colvard has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -69.04%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat Charles & Colvard's return on equity of -47.77%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $12.04, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Charles & Colvard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 978.33%. Given that Charles & Colvard has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe Charles & Colvard is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles & Colvard has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.424%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Charles & Colvard offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles & Colvard pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are larger than Charles & Colvard quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is higher than Charles & Colvard's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while Charles & Colvard's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.03x versus 0.13x for Charles & Colvard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneWater Marine has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -3.19%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat OneWater Marine's return on equity of -2.71%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $12.04, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand OneWater Marine has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 33.65%. Given that OneWater Marine has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe OneWater Marine is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.587, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.696%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OneWater Marine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. OneWater Marine pays out -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are smaller than OneWater Marine quarterly revenues of $375.8M. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is higher than OneWater Marine's net income of -$12M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while OneWater Marine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.03x versus 0.14x for OneWater Marine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 13.83%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $12.04, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $183.85 which suggests that it could grow by 9.76%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.172%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Arhaus's is not.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.03x versus 2.88x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.