AQB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of 35.87%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 50.26%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of $102.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.55%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.113, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.736%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.49 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $1.4B. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $508.5M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 4.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 1.28x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limoneira has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -8.96%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Limoneira's return on equity of 4.11%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Limoneira has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.65%. Given that Limoneira has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe Limoneira is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limoneira has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.545%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limoneira offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira pays out 76.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Limoneira quarterly revenues of $34.3M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Limoneira's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limoneira's PE ratio is 40.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 1.61x for Limoneira. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -10.45%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Village Farms International's return on equity of -12.25%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Village Farms International has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 273.58%. Given that Village Farms International has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe Village Farms International is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International has a beta of 2.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.602%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Village Farms International quarterly revenues of $82.6M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Village Farms International's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Village Farms International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 0.17x for Village Farms International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

22nd Century Group has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -247.47%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat 22nd Century Group's return on equity of -832.63%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand 22nd Century Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1213248.03%. Given that 22nd Century Group has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe 22nd Century Group is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.625% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 22nd Century Group has a beta of 2.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.758%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 22nd Century Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 22nd Century Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than 22nd Century Group quarterly revenues of $1.8M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is higher than 22nd Century Group's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 22nd Century Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.11x versus 0.02x for 22nd Century Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.