AQB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of 17.67%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Cal-Maine Foods's return on equity of 16.61%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.3%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of -0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.214%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 33.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods quarterly revenues of $640.8M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Cal-Maine Foods's net income of $113.2M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cal-Maine Foods's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.22x versus 1.89x for Cal-Maine Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limoneira has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -4.24%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Limoneira's return on equity of 3.85%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Limoneira has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.81%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Limoneira, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Limoneira.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limoneira has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.733%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limoneira offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira pays out 76.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Limoneira quarterly revenues of $43.9M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Limoneira's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limoneira's PE ratio is 65.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.22x versus 2.35x for Limoneira. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&W Seed has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of -195.32%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat S&W Seed's return on equity of -83.77%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand S&W Seed has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 511.89%. Given that S&W Seed has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, analysts believe S&W Seed is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&W Seed has a beta of 1.566, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.58%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. S&W Seed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. S&W Seed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than S&W Seed quarterly revenues of $8.3M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is higher than S&W Seed's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&W Seed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.22x versus 0.25x for S&W Seed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Farms has a net margin of -7120.24% compared to AquaBounty Technologies's net margin of 5.14%. AquaBounty Technologies's return on equity of -52.84% beat Vital Farms's return on equity of 23.14%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Vital Farms has an analysts' consensus of $44.17 which suggests that it could grow by 12.3%. Given that AquaBounty Technologies has higher upside potential than Vital Farms, analysts believe AquaBounty Technologies is more attractive than Vital Farms.

AquaBounty Technologies has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Farms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AquaBounty Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vital Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AquaBounty Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AquaBounty Technologies quarterly revenues are $47.8K, which are smaller than Vital Farms quarterly revenues of $145M. AquaBounty Technologies's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Vital Farms's net income of $7.4M. Notably, AquaBounty Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vital Farms's PE ratio is 35.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AquaBounty Technologies is 2.22x versus 3.04x for Vital Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.