ALOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of -18.51%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat GoPro's return on equity of -166.14%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than GoPro.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.012%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $200.9M. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.43x versus 0.11x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 3.26%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 68.97%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Immersion, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Immersion.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.401, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.06%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.43x versus 0.19x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of 5.01%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 7.59%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of $39.89 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.578%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $64.1M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 34.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.43x versus 2.37x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -41.75% compared to AstroNova's net margin of -77.77%. AstroNova's return on equity of -16.42% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -26.59%.

AstroNova has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179.87%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 84.93%. Given that AstroNova has higher upside potential than Transact Technologies, analysts believe AstroNova is more attractive than Transact Technologies.

AstroNova has a beta of 0.642, which suggesting that the stock is 35.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.695%.

AstroNova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AstroNova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AstroNova quarterly revenues are $37.4M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.2M. AstroNova's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of -$8M. Notably, AstroNova's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AstroNova is 0.43x versus 0.84x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.