AIRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Physicians Capital Group has a net margin of -14.2% compared to AirSculpt Technologies's net margin of --. AirSculpt Technologies's return on equity of -9.29% beat First Physicians Capital Group's return on equity of --.

AirSculpt Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.08%. On the other hand First Physicians Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AirSculpt Technologies has higher upside potential than First Physicians Capital Group, analysts believe AirSculpt Technologies is more attractive than First Physicians Capital Group.

AirSculpt Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Physicians Capital Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AirSculpt Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Physicians Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AirSculpt Technologies pays -10.36% of its earnings as a dividend. First Physicians Capital Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AirSculpt Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.5M, which are larger than First Physicians Capital Group quarterly revenues of --. AirSculpt Technologies's net income of -$6M is higher than First Physicians Capital Group's net income of --. Notably, AirSculpt Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 311.08x while First Physicians Capital Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AirSculpt Technologies is 1.66x versus 1.40x for First Physicians Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IQVIA Holdings has a net margin of -14.2% compared to AirSculpt Technologies's net margin of 7.32%. AirSculpt Technologies's return on equity of -9.29% beat IQVIA Holdings's return on equity of 21.99%.

AirSculpt Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.08%. On the other hand IQVIA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $249.54 which suggests that it could grow by 24.78%. Given that IQVIA Holdings has higher upside potential than AirSculpt Technologies, analysts believe IQVIA Holdings is more attractive than AirSculpt Technologies.

AirSculpt Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IQVIA Holdings has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.559%.

AirSculpt Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IQVIA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AirSculpt Technologies pays -10.36% of its earnings as a dividend. IQVIA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AirSculpt Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.5M, which are smaller than IQVIA Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.9B. AirSculpt Technologies's net income of -$6M is lower than IQVIA Holdings's net income of $285M. Notably, AirSculpt Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 311.08x while IQVIA Holdings's PE ratio is 26.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AirSculpt Technologies is 1.66x versus 2.41x for IQVIA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UNIVEC has a net margin of -14.2% compared to AirSculpt Technologies's net margin of --. AirSculpt Technologies's return on equity of -9.29% beat UNIVEC's return on equity of --.

AirSculpt Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.08%. On the other hand UNIVEC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AirSculpt Technologies has higher upside potential than UNIVEC, analysts believe AirSculpt Technologies is more attractive than UNIVEC.

AirSculpt Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UNIVEC has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.927%.

AirSculpt Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UNIVEC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AirSculpt Technologies pays -10.36% of its earnings as a dividend. UNIVEC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AirSculpt Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.5M, which are larger than UNIVEC quarterly revenues of --. AirSculpt Technologies's net income of -$6M is higher than UNIVEC's net income of --. Notably, AirSculpt Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 311.08x while UNIVEC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AirSculpt Technologies is 1.66x versus -- for UNIVEC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SCWorx has a net margin of -14.2% compared to AirSculpt Technologies's net margin of -55.94%. AirSculpt Technologies's return on equity of -9.29% beat SCWorx's return on equity of -80.46%.

AirSculpt Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.08%. On the other hand SCWorx has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AirSculpt Technologies has higher upside potential than SCWorx, analysts believe AirSculpt Technologies is more attractive than SCWorx.

AirSculpt Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SCWorx has a beta of 2.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 179.246%.

AirSculpt Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SCWorx offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AirSculpt Technologies pays -10.36% of its earnings as a dividend. SCWorx pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AirSculpt Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.5M, which are larger than SCWorx quarterly revenues of $759.7K. AirSculpt Technologies's net income of -$6M is lower than SCWorx's net income of -$425K. Notably, AirSculpt Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 311.08x while SCWorx's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AirSculpt Technologies is 1.66x versus 0.65x for SCWorx. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.