AIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of -2.45% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -8.56%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -12.53% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -4.31%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 48.85%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $11.85 which suggests that it could grow by 37.53%. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Intellinetics.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.162%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $77M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.6M. PowerFleet's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$392.9K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 227.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 2.21x versus 3.56x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -2.45% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -2893.73%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -12.53% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 48.85%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $77M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. PowerFleet's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 2.21x versus 1.62x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -2.45% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -1.23%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -12.53% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 48.85%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than WidePoint.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $77M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. PowerFleet's net income of -$1.9M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 2.21x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -2.45% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -6.48%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -12.53% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 48.85%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 101.54%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than PowerFleet, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than PowerFleet.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $77M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $268.3M. PowerFleet's net income of -$1.9M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 2.21x versus 3.64x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.