Financhill
Buy
65

EATS.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.18
Seasonality move :
-1.37%
Day range:
$0.15 - $0.15
52-week range:
$0.02 - $0.30
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
43.25x
P/B ratio:
0.94x
Volume:
46K
Avg. volume:
276.2K
1-year change:
100%
Market cap:
$4.4M
Revenue:
$4.6K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.15

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
-- -- -- -- --
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
-- -- -- -- --
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
-- -- -- -- --
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
-- -- -- -- --
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
$0.15 -- $4.4M -- $0.00 0% 43.25x
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
$0.04 -- $6.4M -- $0.00 0% --
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
$0.18 -- $1.2M -- $0.00 0% 10.79x
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
$0.25 -- $2.1M -- $0.00 0% --
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
$0.04 -- $2.3M -- $0.00 0% --
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
$0.37 -- $19.9M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
-- 14.784 -- 0.03x
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
0.37% -3.651 0.48% 0.22x
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
-- 12.915 -- 0.89x
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
-- -2.751 -- --
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
-- 0.000 -- --
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
90.71% 16.911 1151.73% 0.09x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
-$351.1K -$80.6K -534.2% -534.2% 547.62% -$2.2K
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
-- -- -51.11% -51.29% 81.44% $22.6K
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
-$15.9K -$398.5K -82.06% -89.68% -933.77% -$92.5K
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
-- -$254.2K -- -- -- -$243.6K
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
-- -- -- -- -- --
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
-- -- -60.23% -190.36% 98.37% $3.7M

Eat & Beyond Global Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or AAB.TO?

    Aberdeen International has a net margin of -35037.78% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of 81.41%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat Aberdeen International's return on equity of -51.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    -- -$0.00 -$928.1K
    AAB.TO
    Aberdeen International
    -- $0.01 $11.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or AAB.TO?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aberdeen International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Aberdeen International, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than Aberdeen International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    0 0 0
    AAB.TO
    Aberdeen International
    0 0 0
  • Is EATS.CX or AAB.TO More Risky?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aberdeen International has a beta of 1.669, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.924%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or AAB.TO?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aberdeen International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aberdeen International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or AAB.TO?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are smaller than Aberdeen International quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is lower than Aberdeen International's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aberdeen International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 43.25x versus -- for Aberdeen International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    43.25x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K
    AAB.TO
    Aberdeen International
    -- -- $1.9M $1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?

    Cloud3 Ventures has a net margin of -35037.78% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of -933.77%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat Cloud3 Ventures's return on equity of -89.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    -- -$0.00 -$928.1K
    CLDV.CX
    Cloud3 Ventures
    -32.39% -$0.05 $4M
  • What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cloud3 Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Cloud3 Ventures, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than Cloud3 Ventures.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    0 0 0
    CLDV.CX
    Cloud3 Ventures
    0 0 0
  • Is EATS.CX or CLDV.CX More Risky?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloud3 Ventures has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloud3 Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloud3 Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are smaller than Cloud3 Ventures quarterly revenues of $49K. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than Cloud3 Ventures's net income of -$457.2K. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloud3 Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 43.25x versus 10.79x for Cloud3 Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    43.25x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K
    CLDV.CX
    Cloud3 Ventures
    10.79x -- $49K -$457.2K
  • Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?

    GOAT Industries has a net margin of -35037.78% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat GOAT Industries's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    -- -$0.00 -$928.1K
    GOAT.CX
    GOAT Industries
    -- -$0.04 --
  • What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GOAT Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than GOAT Industries, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than GOAT Industries.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    0 0 0
    GOAT.CX
    GOAT Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is EATS.CX or GOAT.CX More Risky?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GOAT Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GOAT Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GOAT Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are larger than GOAT Industries quarterly revenues of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than GOAT Industries's net income of -$254.2K. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GOAT Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 43.25x versus -- for GOAT Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    43.25x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K
    GOAT.CX
    GOAT Industries
    -- -- -- -$254.2K
  • Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or POLE.CX?

    Polaris Northstar Capital has a net margin of -35037.78% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat Polaris Northstar Capital's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    -- -$0.00 -$928.1K
    POLE.CX
    Polaris Northstar Capital
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or POLE.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polaris Northstar Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Polaris Northstar Capital, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than Polaris Northstar Capital.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    0 0 0
    POLE.CX
    Polaris Northstar Capital
    0 0 0
  • Is EATS.CX or POLE.CX More Risky?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris Northstar Capital has a beta of 8.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 740.313%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or POLE.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polaris Northstar Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris Northstar Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or POLE.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are larger than Polaris Northstar Capital quarterly revenues of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than Polaris Northstar Capital's net income of --. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polaris Northstar Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 43.25x versus -- for Polaris Northstar Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    43.25x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K
    POLE.CX
    Polaris Northstar Capital
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or SOL.CX?

    SOL Global Investments has a net margin of -35037.78% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of 13.53%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat SOL Global Investments's return on equity of -190.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    -- -$0.00 -$928.1K
    SOL.CX
    SOL Global Investments
    -- -$0.06 $34.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or SOL.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SOL Global Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than SOL Global Investments, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than SOL Global Investments.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    0 0 0
    SOL.CX
    SOL Global Investments
    0 0 0
  • Is EATS.CX or SOL.CX More Risky?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SOL Global Investments has a beta of 2.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.427%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or SOL.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SOL Global Investments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SOL Global Investments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or SOL.CX?

    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are larger than SOL Global Investments quarterly revenues of -$22.8M. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than SOL Global Investments's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SOL Global Investments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 43.25x versus -- for SOL Global Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EATS.CX
    Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
    43.25x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K
    SOL.CX
    SOL Global Investments
    -- -- -$22.8M -$3.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?

Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…

NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?

If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.

Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24

Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.

Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock