KAST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcast Marketing Group has a net margin of -- compared to Kasten's net margin of --. Kasten's return on equity of -- beat Broadcast Marketing Group's return on equity of --.

Kasten has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadcast Marketing Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kasten has higher upside potential than Broadcast Marketing Group, analysts believe Kasten is more attractive than Broadcast Marketing Group.

Kasten has a beta of 6.132, which suggesting that the stock is 513.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcast Marketing Group has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.778%.

Kasten has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcast Marketing Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kasten pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcast Marketing Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kasten quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Broadcast Marketing Group quarterly revenues of --. Kasten's net income of -- is lower than Broadcast Marketing Group's net income of --. Notably, Kasten's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadcast Marketing Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kasten is -- versus -- for Broadcast Marketing Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group has a net margin of -- compared to Kasten's net margin of 42.13%. Kasten's return on equity of -- beat Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group's return on equity of 20.3%.

Kasten has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kasten has higher upside potential than Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group, analysts believe Kasten is more attractive than Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group.

Kasten has a beta of 6.132, which suggesting that the stock is 513.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group has a beta of 17.744, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1674.432%.

Kasten has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kasten pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group pays out 148.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kasten quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Kasten's net income of -- is lower than Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group's net income of $703.6K. Notably, Kasten's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group's PE ratio is 357,000.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kasten is -- versus 115.14x for Entrepreneur Universe Bright Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exponent has a net margin of -- compared to Kasten's net margin of 18.32%. Kasten's return on equity of -- beat Exponent's return on equity of 25.86%.

Kasten has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Exponent has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20%. Given that Exponent has higher upside potential than Kasten, analysts believe Exponent is more attractive than Kasten.

Kasten has a beta of 6.132, which suggesting that the stock is 513.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exponent has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.45%.

Kasten has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exponent offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Kasten pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent pays out 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kasten quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Exponent quarterly revenues of $145.5M. Kasten's net income of -- is lower than Exponent's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Kasten's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exponent's PE ratio is 37.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kasten is -- versus 7.08x for Exponent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of -- compared to Kasten's net margin of 0.05%. Kasten's return on equity of -- beat Tetra Tech's return on equity of 15.59%.

Kasten has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tetra Tech has an analysts' consensus of $40.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.12%. Given that Tetra Tech has higher upside potential than Kasten, analysts believe Tetra Tech is more attractive than Kasten.

Kasten has a beta of 6.132, which suggesting that the stock is 513.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.567%.

Kasten has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tetra Tech offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Kasten pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tetra Tech pays out 17.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Tetra Tech's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kasten quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tetra Tech quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Kasten's net income of -- is lower than Tetra Tech's net income of $747K. Notably, Kasten's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tetra Tech's PE ratio is 37.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kasten is -- versus 1.78x for Tetra Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.